Long-term plan section:
|
School:
|
||||||
Date:
|
Teacher name:
|
||||||
Class:
|
Number of students: Absent: |
||||||
Theme of the lesson |
Isoprocesses |
||||||
Learning objectives |
To apply gas laws when solving calculations and graphics problems
|
||||||
Lesson objectives |
Link the previously learned concepts of states of matter to the macroscopic behaviour of gas and ideal gases behavior with one parameter kept constant
|
||||||
Assessment criteria |
Students can prepare and present the information about gas laws in creative way (posters presentation) Students can define and identify how to modify the ideal gas equation to the form of Gay-Lussac’s, Boyle-Marriot and Charle’s law and know when to apply which one
|
||||||
Language objectives
|
Students can use correct vocabulary to explain orally how the ideal gas model accounts for behavior of gases These include words such as: monoatomic, diatomic, polyatomic, expansion, compression, inversely proportional, directly proportional, linear proportionality, increase, decrease.
|
||||||
Value links
|
Values of cooperation and understanding, on how many scientists worked to solve problems in industries over centuries in different cultures and countries. How scientific discoveries are made, as well as how to solve problems by scientific enquiry are instilled by learning to communicate information in a precise and accurate way.
|
||||||
Cross curricular links |
Links to uses of ideal gas laws in chemistry and industrial applications are useful in real life.
|
||||||
Previous learning |
Grade 7-8: States of matter and thermal energy transfer between substances. How microscopic and macroscopic behavior of matter can be linked qualitatively.
|
||||||
Lesson procedure |
|||||||
Planned stages |
Planned activities |
Resources |
|||||
Beginning 3min |
Students are familiarized with lesson’s topic, learning objectives and assessment criteria. |
Slides 1-3 |
|||||
Middle
35min
|
Students are organized into four group in order to work on posters: 1) Fundamental equation of molecular-kinetic theory of gases 2) Boyle-Marriot’s law 3) Charles’ law 4) Gay-Lussac’s law
Students are given the task to prepare poster about their topic (10 min) After the posters are ready each group is given 3 min to present it in front of the class: 2 min to present + 1 min to answer the questions from the class (optional) The students will be revised and generalized the topic of “Ideal gas laws” in that way before having formative assessment on the topic
Formative assessment (12 min) |
Colored pencils or markers, paper of at least A3 size (A2 is preferred)
Slides 4-5
Slides 3-4
Word document “Criteria of assessment”
Slides 6-7
Slide 8
Word document “Formative assessment”
|
|||||
End 2min |
Reflection: Success ladder (provide the students with the printed version of the last slide)
|
Slide 9
Word document “Reflection”
|
|||||
|
|
||||||
Differentiation - how do you plan to provide more support? What tasks do you plan to set for more capable students? |
Grading - How do you plan to check students' level of learning? |
Health
& Safety |
|
||||
Students with higher ability in both English and physics (language and content) might take the leading part during presentation of posters Teacher should organize the groups so that students with different abilities are mixed up with inside |
Students’ work on posters is being assessed according to the assessment criteria for the posters (can be done by teacher or even better peer-assessment of students) The formative assessment is being checked and the feedback is being provided on the next lesson
|
Not specific for this lesson |
|
||||
Reflection Were the lesson objectives/learning objectives realistic? Did all learners achieve the LO? If not, why? Did my planned differentiation work well? Did I stick to timings? What changes did I make from my plan and why? |
Use the space below to reflect on your lesson. Answer the most relevant questions from the box on the left about your lesson.
|
|
|
||
Summary evaluation What two things went really well (consider both teaching and learning)? 1: 2: What two things would have improved the lesson (consider both teaching and learning)? 1: . 2: What have I learned from this lesson about the class or achievements/difficulties of individuals that will inform my next lesson?
|
Скачано с www.znanio.ru
Материалы на данной страницы взяты из открытых источников либо размещены пользователем в соответствии с договором-офертой сайта. Вы можете сообщить о нарушении.